UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-I202515 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q7.

Duopoly Market Equilibrium: Optimal Price & Output

Consider a firm in a Duopoly market with product differentiation in which, Duopolist I faces a demand function given by :

P₁ = 200-4q₁-2q₂

The cost function of Duopolist I is :

C₁ = 5q₁²

Assume that Duopolist II has ⅓ rd share of the whole market.

Find out optimal price, output and profit for Duopolist I. Also find out the output of Duopolist II.

How to Approach

The question requires calculating optimal price, output, and profit for Duopolist I and the output for Duopolist II in a differentiated duopoly market. The approach involves setting up the profit maximization problem for Duopolist I, deriving the reaction function, incorporating Duopolist II's market share assumption, and then solving for equilibrium quantities and price.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

In the realm of industrial organization, a duopoly represents a market structure dominated by two firms. When products are differentiated, these firms compete not solely on price but also on features, branding, and quality, leading to distinct demand curves for each. This scenario often results in strategic interdependence, where each firm's optimal decision depends on the actions of its rival. Understanding such market dynamics is crucial for firms to formulate effective pricing and production strategies, ultimately impacting market equilibrium and consumer welfare.

Understanding the Duopoly Model with Product Differentiation

In a duopoly with product differentiation, firms produce similar but not identical products. This allows each firm to have some market power and face a downward-sloping demand curve for its specific product. The demand for one firm's product is influenced by its own price and quantity, as well as the price and quantity of the rival firm.

Step-by-Step Calculation for Duopolist I

1. Duopolist I's Demand and Cost Functions:

Given demand function for Duopolist I:

P₁ = 200 - 4q₁ - 2q₂

Given cost function for Duopolist I:

C₁ = 5q₁²

2. Derive Duopolist I's Total Revenue (TR₁) and Marginal Revenue (MR₁):

Total Revenue (TR₁) = P₁ * q₁

TR₁ = (200 - 4q₁ - 2q₂) * q₁

TR₁ = 200q₁ - 4q₁² - 2q₁q₂

Marginal Revenue (MR₁) is the derivative of TR₁ with respect to q₁:

MR₁ = ∂TR₁/∂q₁

MR₁ = 200 - 8q₁ - 2q₂

3. Derive Duopolist I's Marginal Cost (MC₁):

Marginal Cost (MC₁) is the derivative of C₁ with respect to q₁:

MC₁ = ∂C₁/∂q₁

MC₁ = 10q₁

4. Profit Maximization for Duopolist I:

To maximize profit, Duopolist I sets MR₁ = MC₁:

200 - 8q₁ - 2q₂ = 10q₁

200 - 2q₂ = 18q₁

This gives Duopolist I's reaction function (how q₁ changes based on q₂):

18q₁ = 200 - 2q₂

q₁ = (200 - 2q₂) / 18

q₁ = 100/9 - (1/9)q₂ (Equation 1)

5. Incorporate Duopolist II's Market Share:

Assume Duopolist II has ⅓ rd share of the whole market. This implies that q₂ = (1/3) * (q₁ + q₂), but this interpretation is not directly applicable in a Cournot-style model where quantities are set independently, though influencing each other. A more practical interpretation in such a problem, especially without the explicit total market size, is that Duopolist II's output is some fraction of the total market as perceived or an assumption about relative production. If the question implies that Duopolist II's output is 1/3 of the total market output (Q = q₁ + q₂), then q₂ = (1/3)(q₁ + q₂). This simplifies to 3q₂ = q₁ + q₂, so 2q₂ = q₁, or q₂ = (1/2)q₁.

Let's consider the interpretation that Duopolist II's output is related to Duopolist I's output in a fixed ratio, such that if Duopolist I has ⅔ share, then Duopolist II has ⅓ share. This would mean q₂ = (1/2)q₁. However, this is usually given directly. Given the phrasing "Duopolist II has ⅓ rd share of the whole market," and without information on total market demand function, the most direct interpretation for solving this specific problem structure is often that q₂ is some constant fraction of q₁. Let's re-evaluate based on the demand function. A more common simplification in such problems (if not explicitly stated as a reaction function) is to consider the relative output. If Duopolist II has 1/3 share of the whole market, it usually implies that its output (q₂) is 1/3 of the total market output (Q = q₁+q₂). So, q₂ = (1/3)(q₁+q₂), which simplifies to 3q₂ = q₁+q₂, or 2q₂ = q₁. Therefore, q₂ = (1/2)q₁.

Substitute q₂ = (1/2)q₁ into Equation 1:

q₁ = 100/9 - (1/9)((1/2)q₁)

q₁ = 100/9 - (1/18)q₁

q₁ + (1/18)q₁ = 100/9

(18q₁ + q₁) / 18 = 100/9

19q₁ / 18 = 100/9

q₁ = (100/9) * (18/19)

q₁ = 200/19

6. Calculate Optimal Output for Duopolist I (q₁):

q₁ ≈ 10.526 units

7. Calculate Output for Duopolist II (q₂):

Using q₂ = (1/2)q₁:

q₂ = (1/2) * (200/19)

q₂ = 100/19

q₂ ≈ 5.263 units

8. Calculate Optimal Price for Duopolist I (P₁):

Substitute q₁ and q₂ into Duopolist I's demand function:

P₁ = 200 - 4q₁ - 2q₂

P₁ = 200 - 4(200/19) - 2(100/19)

P₁ = 200 - 800/19 - 200/19

P₁ = 200 - 1000/19

P₁ = (3800 - 1000) / 19

P₁ = 2800 / 19

P₁ ≈ 147.368

9. Calculate Optimal Profit for Duopolist I (π₁):

Profit (π₁) = TR₁ - C₁

TR₁ = P₁ * q₁ = (2800/19) * (200/19)

TR₁ = 560000 / 361 ≈ 1551.246

C₁ = 5q₁² = 5 * (200/19)²

C₁ = 5 * (40000 / 361)

C₁ = 200000 / 361 ≈ 554.017

π₁ = (560000 / 361) - (200000 / 361)

π₁ = 360000 / 361

π₁ ≈ 997.229

Summary of Optimal Values for Duopolist I and Duopolist II

Parameter Value (Exact) Value (Approximate)
Optimal Output for Duopolist I (q₁) 200/19 10.53 units
Optimal Price for Duopolist I (P₁) 2800/19 147.37
Optimal Profit for Duopolist I (π₁) 360000/361 997.23
Output for Duopolist II (q₂) 100/19 5.26 units

Conclusion

The analysis of a duopoly with product differentiation, as demonstrated by the calculation for Duopolist I, highlights the strategic interdependence inherent in such market structures. By understanding its own demand and cost functions, and making assumptions about the rival's behavior (in this case, market share), a firm can determine its profit-maximizing output and price. These calculations are fundamental in microeconomics for understanding firm behavior, market equilibrium, and the implications of various competitive strategies, ultimately contributing to a robust understanding of market dynamics.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Duopoly
A specific type of oligopoly where only two producers exist in a market. In essence, it is the most basic form of oligopoly. It can involve either homogeneous or differentiated products.
Product Differentiation
The process of distinguishing a product or service from others, to make it more attractive to a target market. This involves highlighting unique features, branding, quality, or other attributes that set it apart from competitors.

Key Statistics

According to a 2023 report by Grand View Research, the global market for specific differentiated consumer goods often shows high concentration ratios, with the top two firms frequently capturing over 50% of market share in niche segments.

Source: Grand View Research (2023)

A study on the Indian e-commerce market in 2024 revealed that while several players exist, the top two dominant platforms (often referred to as a duopoly in certain segments) collectively account for over 80% of online retail sales by value, indicative of strong market power and product differentiation strategies.

Source: Statista (2024 projections based on market analysis)

Examples

Cola Wars: Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo

The competition between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo is a classic example of a differentiated duopoly. Both companies offer colas, but they have distinct brand identities, marketing strategies, and slight taste differences that allow consumers to differentiate between the products. This differentiation enables both firms to have some control over their pricing rather than being perfect substitutes.

Smartphone Operating Systems: Android vs. iOS

Google's Android and Apple's iOS represent a powerful duopoly in the smartphone operating system market. While both provide core smartphone functionalities, their ecosystems, user interfaces, app stores, and associated hardware (Apple's iPhones vs. various Android devices) are highly differentiated, creating distinct user experiences and loyal customer bases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a Cournot and a Bertrand duopoly?

In a Cournot duopoly, firms compete by choosing quantities simultaneously, taking the other firm's output as given. In a Bertrand duopoly, firms compete by choosing prices simultaneously, taking the other firm's price as given. The resulting equilibrium often differs significantly, with Bertrand leading to prices closer to marginal cost under certain conditions.

How does product differentiation affect market outcomes in a duopoly?

Product differentiation typically softens price competition. When products are identical, firms are forced to compete solely on price, often driving prices down to marginal cost. With differentiated products, firms can charge higher prices and earn positive economic profits because their products are not perfect substitutes, giving them some degree of market power.

Topics Covered

EconomicsMicroeconomicsMarket StructuresOligopolyGame Theory