UPSC MainsGEOLOGY-PAPER-II202515 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q25.

What are the physiological and morphological changes of the plants helpful in geobotanical prospecting of copper, manganese and uranium deposits? Add a note on commonly found plant indicators for zinc.

How to Approach

The answer should begin by defining geobotanical prospecting and its underlying principles. The main body will systematically detail the physiological and morphological changes observed in plants due to elevated concentrations of copper, manganese, and uranium, supported by specific plant examples where possible. Finally, a dedicated section will cover commonly found plant indicators for zinc. Ensure a clear structure with subheadings and incorporate recent findings or examples to enhance the answer's quality and relevance.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Geobotanical prospecting is a specialized method within mineral exploration that utilizes the intimate relationship between vegetation and its underlying geological substrate to detect concealed mineral deposits. This non-invasive and often cost-effective technique is rooted in the principle that anomalous concentrations of metals in the soil lead to distinctive physiological and morphological responses in plants, or the selective growth of certain "indicator" species. Plants act as natural bio-samplers, absorbing elements from the soil through their roots, which can then be identified through visual observation or chemical analysis. The efficacy of geobotanical methods has been demonstrated globally, from early applications in China to more recent discoveries, making it a valuable tool, especially when integrated with other geological and geochemical prospecting techniques.

Geobotanical prospecting relies on the observable changes in plant life, both in their physical form (morphology) and internal functions (physiology), when exposed to anomalous concentrations of metals in the soil. These changes can range from subtle alterations in color and growth patterns to the exclusive presence of certain metallophyte species.

Physiological and Morphological Changes in Plants for Copper, Manganese, and Uranium Deposits

The presence of high concentrations of specific metals like copper, manganese, and uranium in the soil can induce characteristic physiological and morphological changes in plants.

1. Copper (Cu) Deposits

Elevated copper levels in soil, while an essential micronutrient in small quantities, can become toxic, leading to discernible plant responses.
  • Chlorosis: Copper toxicity can hinder the photosynthetic process, leading to a yellowing of leaves (chlorosis). This is a common physiological response to excess heavy metals.
  • Stunted Growth: Plants growing in copper-rich soils often exhibit stunted growth, reduced biomass, and overall smaller stature due due to inhibited root and shoot development.
  • Anomalous Flowering/Fruiting: Some species might show altered flowering times or unusual fruit development.
  • Indicator Plants (Cuprophytes): Certain plant species, known as "cuprophytes" or copper indicator plants, thrive exclusively on copper-rich soils, often forming dense, distinct communities where other plants struggle.
  • Examples:
    • The Zambian copper flower, Becium centraliafricanum (formerly Becium homblei or Ocimum centraliafricanum), is a "most faithful" indicator plant found only on copper-rich soils in central to southern Africa.
    • Haumaniastrum katangense is another prominent copper indicator, forming dense carpets over ancient copper mines in Zaire.
    • In the Malanjkhand granitoid region of Madhya Pradesh, Jangh Tulsi (Hyptis suaveolens) with stunted growth, and Kurlu tree (Sterculia urens) have been identified as copper indicator and accumulator plants, respectively.

2. Manganese (Mn) Deposits

Manganese is an essential plant nutrient, but its excess can be toxic, leading to specific changes.
  • Chlorosis and Necrosis: High manganese concentrations can interfere with iron uptake and chlorophyll synthesis, resulting in interveinal chlorosis (yellowing between veins) and necrotic spots (dead tissue) on leaves, often starting from older leaves.
  • Stunted Growth and Reduced Yield: Similar to copper, excessive manganese can inhibit plant growth, leading to dwarfing, reduced leaf size, and lower biomass production.
  • Crinkled or Cupped Leaves: Leaves may appear crinkled, cupped, or distorted due to cellular damage.
  • Indicator Plants: While less specific indicator plants are noted compared to copper, some plants show high accumulation.
  • Examples:
    • Gossia bidwillii from Australia and Virotia neurophylla from New Caledonia are known manganese hyperaccumulators.

3. Uranium (U) Deposits

Uranium is not an essential plant nutrient, and its presence in soil, especially due to its radioactivity, can be highly toxic.
  • Stunted Growth and Dwarfism: Plants growing over uranium deposits often exhibit significantly stunted growth and dwarfism, a general stress response to toxicity.
  • Chlorosis: Yellowing of leaves (chlorosis) is a common physiological symptom due to hindered photosynthetic processes and nutrient uptake.
  • Malformed Leaves and Flowers: Radiation and toxicity can lead to various morphological abnormalities, including malformed leaves, irregular flower development, and sometimes altered flower color. For instance, the blue stamens of the western spiderwort can turn pink in the presence of radiation.
  • Premature Senescence: Plants may show premature aging and dying of leaves or entire plants.
  • Indicator Plants: Certain plants have been identified to accumulate uranium or elements associated with it (pathfinder elements like selenium and sulfur).
  • Examples:
    • Species of Astragalus (milk-vetch, locoweed), particularly Astragalus pattersoni, are significant indicators for uranium deposits, especially on the Colorado Plateau, as they concentrate selenium, which is often associated with uranium ores. These plants can detect ore bodies up to 70 feet below the surface.
    • Bryophytes (mosses and liverworts) like Marchantia polymorpha generally show increased uranium levels.
    • Juniper and saltbush branch tips are known to concentrate uranium due to their deep root systems.
    • Other plants like Aster venustas and Astragalus albulus have also been identified.

Commonly Found Plant Indicators for Zinc (Zn)

Zinc is an essential micronutrient, but at high concentrations, it becomes toxic. Plants exhibiting certain characteristics or specific species can indicate zinc mineralization. Zinc toxicity often leads to chlorosis and stunted growth, similar to other heavy metal toxicities.
Plant Type/Species Characteristic/Indication Location/Context
Hyperaccumulators Plants capable of accumulating exceptionally high concentrations of zinc in their tissues without showing toxicity symptoms. They actively accumulate metals in their aerial tissues and generally reflect metal levels in the soil. General, used in biogeochemical prospecting.
Thlaspi caerulescens (Alpine Pennycress) One of the most well-known zinc hyperaccumulators, actively accumulating zinc and cadmium. Agglomerations reaching more than normal sizes can indicate zinc deposits. Found in Zn/Pb-rich soils, serpentine, and non-mineralized soils.
Viola lutea subsp. calaminaria (Yellow Calamine Violet / Zinc Violet) This species specifically thrives in soils with high zinc concentrations; its petal color can sometimes indicate zinc concentration. Found in zinc-rich soils, particularly in Europe.
Populus grandidentata (Bigtooth Aspen) Known to store zinc in its tissues at a high ratio (e.g., 250:1,000,000 on zinc-rich soils). Commonly found in regions with underlying zinc deposits.
Achillea millefolium (Common Yarrow / Milfoil) Accumulates zinc in its tissues at very high ratios (e.g., 4,500:1,000,000 on zinc-rich soils). Widespread, but shows significant accumulation in zinc-contaminated areas.
Crotalaria novae-hollandiae Identified as a zinc hyperaccumulator. Australia.
Impatiens balsamia A possible zinc indicator plant identified in the Zawar Pb-Zn belt in India, growing selectively on zinc dumps. Zawar Pb-Zn belt, India.
Leucas aspera (Family: Labiatae) Exhibits luxuriant growth on mine dumps and waste heaps in zinc-rich areas like Rajpura-Dariba, India. Ash analysis shows conspicuous zinc concentration. Rajpura-Dariba area, India.
Taraxacum spec. (Dandelion species) Shows high accumulation of zinc and is considered to indicate the level of bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the environment. Commonly found, but particularly useful in areas of contamination.
Pinus brutia Can be used as a biogeochemical medium to detect iron and zinc in soil analysis. Mersin, Turkey.

Conclusion

Geobotanical prospecting, through the careful observation of physiological and morphological changes in plants and the identification of specific indicator species, offers an invaluable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective approach to mineral exploration. The distinctive responses of plants to elevated concentrations of copper, manganese, and uranium – such as chlorosis, stunted growth, premature senescence, or the exclusive presence of hyperaccumulators – provide vital clues to hidden ore bodies. Coupled with biogeochemical analysis, this method empowers geologists with a powerful tool for reconnaissance and targeted exploration, especially in areas with thick soil cover or dense vegetation, minimizing the need for more invasive and expensive techniques. As demand for critical minerals grows, refining and integrating geobotanical methods will be crucial for sustainable resource discovery.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Geobotanical Prospecting
A method of mineral exploration based on the visual observation and identification of vegetation or plant cover that reveals the presence of specific types of subsurface mineralization. It involves mapping indicator plants, assessing plant appearance and physiology, and sometimes chemical testing of plant tissues.
Hyperaccumulators
Plants capable of growing in soil or water with high concentrations of metals, absorbing them through their roots, and concentrating exceptionally high levels (often 100 to 1000 times more than non-accumulating plants) of these metals in their harvestable tissues without exhibiting toxicity.

Key Statistics

Some hyperaccumulator plants can accumulate up to 4% nickel in their leaves, translating to over 300 kg of nickel per hectare per year in harvested biomass. The ashed biomass can contain 20-30% nickel, indicating high purity bio-sourced metals.

Source: The University of Queensland, Sustainable Minerals Institute

In the Kangoo basin of Hamirpur district, Himachal Pradesh, plant ash samples revealed uranium values ranging from 4.3 ppm to 96 ppm, with certain fern plants (Adiantum venustum) showing values up to 634 ppm, significantly higher than the typical <1 ppm in unmineralized ground.

Source: Surveys conducted in Kangoo basin, Himachal Pradesh (reported in Environmental Science and Geology, 2010)

Examples

Copper Flower in Africa

The plant <em>Ocimum centraliafricanum</em> (formerly <em>Becium homblei</em>), often called the "copper flower," is a classic example of a "faithful" indicator plant. It is found almost exclusively on soils rich in copper (and nickel) in central and southern Africa, providing a clear visual cue for mineral prospectors.

Astragalus and Uranium on the Colorado Plateau

Various species of <em>Astragalus</em> (milk-vetch and locoweed), particularly <em>Astragalus pattersoni</em>, have been successfully used on the Colorado Plateau to pinpoint areas rich in selenium-rich uranium ore. These deep-rooted plants concentrate selenium, a pathfinder element for uranium, from deposits up to 70 feet below the surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main limitation of geobotanical prospecting?

The main limitation of geobotanical prospecting is that its efficacy can be highly dependent on environmental factors such as climate, soil moisture, and microbial activity, which can influence plant mineral uptake and growth responses. Also, not all plant species respond uniformly to mineral-rich soils, and indicator plants effective in one region may not be reliable in another due to regional variability in ecosystems.

How does biogeochemical prospecting differ from geobotanical prospecting?

While closely related, geobotanical prospecting primarily involves the visual identification of indicator plants and assessment of their morphological and physiological changes. Biogeochemical prospecting, on the other hand, involves the systematic collection and chemical analysis of plant parts (leaves, stems, roots) or ash to quantify the concentration of specific elements, providing a more direct chemical indication of underlying mineralization.

Topics Covered

GeologyEconomic GeologyBiogeochemistryMineral ProspectingPlant IndicatorsBiogeochemical Methods