Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Federalism, in its true spirit, entails a division of powers between the central and state governments, ensuring both autonomy and interdependence. India, often described as a 'quasi-federal' state by scholars like K.C. Wheare, embodies a unique form of federalism balancing a strong Centre with the necessity of robust states. Recent political developments have sparked debates about whether this delicate balance is being eroded. While some argue that centralization tendencies are undermining federal principles, others contend that mechanisms for cooperation and competition continue to reinforce the federal structure, adapting it to contemporary challenges.
The assertion that recent developments in Indian politics have not eroded the true spirit of federalism in India requires a critical examination, considering both the cooperative and confrontational aspects that have emerged. The "true spirit" of federalism, particularly in India, is not merely about a rigid division of powers but also about the collaborative and sometimes competitive interplay between the Union and the States to achieve national development while respecting regional diversity.
Dimensions of Indian Federalism: Cooperative and Competitive
Indian federalism, as envisioned by its founders and evolved over decades, encompasses:
- Cooperative Federalism: Emphasizes collaboration and joint action between the Centre and states for the welfare of the people. It signifies a horizontal relationship where both levels of government share responsibilities and work together.
- Competitive Federalism: Encourages states to compete among themselves and with the Centre to attract investment, improve governance, and enhance public services, fostering innovation and better governance practices.
Developments Reinforcing the Spirit of Federalism
Several recent developments highlight the continued, and in some cases, strengthened, spirit of federalism:
- GST Council (2017): The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax is a prime example of cooperative federalism. The GST Council, comprising Union and State Finance Ministers, makes decisions through consensus, demonstrating collaborative fiscal policy-making. This institutionalized mechanism for shared decision-making on taxation matters is a significant federal achievement.
- NITI Aayog (2015): Replacing the erstwhile Planning Commission, NITI Aayog aims to foster cooperative federalism by involving states in policy-making and providing a platform for structured support initiatives. It promotes 'Team India' spirit, where states are active partners in national development. NITI Aayog's State Performance Indexes (e.g., Health Index, SDG India Index) also promote competitive federalism by ranking states and encouraging peer learning.
- Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: The management of the COVID-19 pandemic showcased cooperative federalism. The central government coordinated resource allocation, guidelines, and vaccine distribution, while state governments implemented localized strategies, demonstrating the importance of collaboration in crisis management.
- Inter-State Councils and Zonal Councils: Institutions like the Inter-State Council (Article 263) and Zonal Councils continue to provide platforms for dialogue and resolution of inter-state and Centre-state issues, promoting coordination.
- Fiscal Federalism Reforms: Recommendations of the Finance Commissions, especially the 15th Finance Commission, have often aimed at increasing the share of states in central taxes and providing performance-based grants, enhancing fiscal autonomy and accountability of states. The 15th Finance Commission suggested raising the states' funding share.
Challenges to the Spirit of Federalism
Despite these reinforcing developments, certain trends have raised concerns about the erosion of federalism:
1. Centralization of Decision-Making:
- Concurrent List Legislation: There have been concerns regarding the Union government legislating unilaterally on subjects in the Concurrent List without adequate consultation with states, for instance, the controversial Farm Laws (since repealed) and the Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2020. States like Kerala and Tamil Nadu have objected to this perceived overreach.
- Use of Central Agencies: Allegations of misuse of central investigative agencies against state political leaders and governments are seen by some as undermining state autonomy.
2. Role of the Governor:
- The office of the Governor has frequently been a point of contention. Governors have been criticized for delaying assent to bills passed by state legislatures or acting as agents of the Centre, thus undermining elected state governments. For example, in Tamil Nadu, the Governor's delay in assenting to the NEET Exemption Bill and refusal to read parts of the state government's address has raised concerns.
3. Fiscal Imbalances and Dependence:
- GST Compensation Delays: Several state governments have raised concerns about delays in the release of Goods and Services Tax (GST) compensation funds, impacting their fiscal stability.
- Conditional Grants: Increased reliance on centrally sponsored schemes with stringent conditions can limit states' flexibility in utilizing funds according to their specific needs and priorities.
4. Erosion of State Autonomy:
- Reorganization of States/UTs: The abrogation of Article 370 and the reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir into Union Territories in 2019, without extensive consultation with the state legislature, was viewed by some as undermining federal principles. Similarly, the formation of Telangana in 2014, where the views of the concerned state were perceived to be ignored, raised questions.
- "One Nation" Initiatives: Concepts like "One Nation, One Election" or "One Nation, One Ration Card" (while beneficial for portability) sometimes lead to debates about potential standardization that might overlook regional specificities and state autonomy.
Conclusion on the "True Spirit"
The "true spirit" of federalism in India is dynamic. While institutions like the GST Council and NITI Aayog have strengthened cooperative and competitive elements, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and healthy competition, certain recent trends indicate a tilt towards centralization. Issues such as the Governor's role, delays in fiscal transfers, and perceived unilateral legislative actions on concurrent subjects pose challenges to the autonomy of states. However, the robust nature of India's democratic institutions, including a vigilant judiciary, active state governments, and a vibrant civil society, ensures that these challenges often lead to debates and demands for course correction, preventing a complete erosion of the federal spirit. Indian federalism is not static but a continuously evolving system striving to balance national unity with regional diversity.
| Aspect of Federalism | Reinforcing Developments (Examples) | Challenging Developments (Examples) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Federalism | GST Council, 15th Finance Commission recommendations (increased state share). | Delays in GST compensation payments, conditional Centrally Sponsored Schemes. |
| Policy Coordination | NITI Aayog, COVID-19 pandemic response, Inter-State Councils. | Unilateral legislation on Concurrent List subjects (e.g., Farm Laws, Electricity Bill). |
| State Autonomy | States initiating competitive growth models (e.g., Vibrant Gujarat Summit, Ease of Doing Business rankings). | Governor's role in delaying bills, reorganization of J&K into UTs, alleged misuse of central agencies. |
Conclusion
In conclusion, while recent developments in Indian politics present a mixed bag, the true spirit of federalism, characterized by a dynamic interplay of cooperation and competition, largely endures. Mechanisms like the GST Council and NITI Aayog exemplify a collaborative approach to governance and development. However, instances of increased central intervention, challenges to state fiscal autonomy, and controversies surrounding the Governor's office indicate ongoing tensions. Indian federalism remains a resilient yet constantly evolving framework, adapting to new political realities while continuously seeking to balance the imperative of a strong Union with the democratic aspirations and diverse needs of its constituent states.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.