UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIIndian Polityअभ्यास प्रश्न

Fundamental Rights for Social Justice and Liberty

भारत में सामाजिक न्याय और व्यक्ति स्वतंत्रता सुनिश्चित करने में मौलिक अधिकारों के महत्व का विश्लेषण करें

विश्लेषण करें~250 शब्द2 मिनटmedium
पहले समयबद्ध अभ्यास करें · वैकल्पिक

परीक्षा की तरह कागज़ पर उत्तर लिखें। टाइमर शुरू करें और शब्द-सीमा का ध्यान रखें।

00:00/ 11 मिनट · 250 शब्द

लिख लिया? पुस्तिका की फोटो लें और देखें कि यह इस आदर्श उत्तर के मुकाबले कितने अंक पाता है, साथ में सुधार के सुझाव।

उत्तर पुस्तिका अपलोड करें

उत्तर कैसे लिखें

The answer should analyze how Part III of the Constitution balances individual liberty with social justice. It needs to examine specific articles that safeguard personal freedoms, address structural inequalities through affirmative action, and discuss the synergy between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.

आदर्श उत्तर

220 शब्द

भूमिका

Part III of the Indian Constitution acts as the nation’s conscience, balancing individual liberty (negative state obligations) with social justice (positive state interventions) to build an egalitarian polity.

Safeguarding Individual Liberty

  • Substantive Dignity: Article 21 has transitioned from procedural to substantive due process (Maneka Gandhi, 1978), securing decisional privacy (K.S. Puttaswamy, 2017) and the right against climate change impacts (M.K. Ranjitsinh, 2024).
  • Civil Freedoms: Article 19 safeguards speech, assembly, and movement. However, these are not absolute and are subject to 'reasonable restrictions' (Article 19(2)) like public order and national security to balance individual autonomy with collective peace.

Ensuring Social Justice

  • Affirmative Action: Articles 14, 15, and 16 enable compensatory discrimination. In the landmark State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024) ruling, the Supreme Court allowed sub-classification of Scheduled Castes, ensuring reservations reach the most marginalized.
  • Eradicating Structural Oppression: Articles 17 (untouchability) and 23-24 (forced/child labor) directly eliminate historical caste-based and economic exploitation.

The FR-DPSP Synergy

While individual liberty (Fundamental Rights) and welfare mandates (Directive Principles of State Policy) may sometimes conflict, the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills (1980) held them to be 'two wheels of a chariot'. Neither is superior; they exist in a state of harmonious construction.

निष्कर्ष

A progressive constitutional approach must ensure that individual autonomy is preserved while dynamically expanding positive state action to uplift the historically marginalized.

याद रखने योग्य तथ्य

definition
Substantive Due Process

A principle allowing courts to protect fundamental rights from government interference, evolving from mere procedural compliance to substantive fairness as seen in the Maneka Gandhi case.

case study
State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (2024)

A landmark Supreme Court judgment that permitted states to sub-classify Scheduled Castes to ensure that reservation benefits reach the most marginalized sections.

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न

How do Fundamental Rights balance individual liberty and social justice?

Fundamental rights provide negative liberties against state overreach while enabling positive state interventions through affirmative action provisions to uplift marginalized groups, harmonized by constitutional interpretation.