MPSC Mainsmpsc_marathiIndian Polityअभ्यास प्रश्न

Crisis of Legislative Efficiency in State Legislatures

राज्य विधिमंडळातील विधायक कार्यक्षमतेचे संकट हे केवळ विरोधाच्या गोंधळामुळे नसून संसदीय वेळ, समिती व्यवस्था, पक्षशिस्त व कार्यकारी वर्चस्व यांच्या संरचनात्मक परस्परसंबंधाचे परिणाम आहे. विश्लेषण करा.

Analyze~250 शब्द2 मिनटmedium
पहले समयबद्ध अभ्यास करें · वैकल्पिक

परीक्षा की तरह कागज़ पर उत्तर लिखें। टाइमर शुरू करें और शब्द-सीमा का ध्यान रखें।

00:00/ 11 मिनट · 250 शब्द

लिख लिया? पुस्तिका की फोटो लें और देखें कि यह इस आदर्श उत्तर के मुकाबले कितने अंक पाता है, साथ में सुधार के सुझाव।

उत्तर पुस्तिका अपलोड करें

उत्तर कैसे लिखें

Introduce the issue by clarifying that declining legislative efficacy stems from structural flaws rather than superficial disruptions. Analyse the four key structural factors: executive dominance, shrinking legislative sittings, weak committee systems, and rigid party discipline under anti-defection laws. Conclude with actionable constitutional and institutional reforms.

आदर्श उत्तर

264 शब्द

भूमिका

The decline in legislative efficiency in State Legislatures is visibly marked by opposition disruptions, but it is fundamentally rooted in systemic structural imbalances that undermine the core functions of debate, scrutiny, and executive accountability.

Structural Causes of the Legislative Crisis

The institutional decline of State Assemblies is driven by the structural interrelationship of several systemic constraints:

  • Executive Dominance: The executive frequently bypasses legislative deliberation through ordinances under Article 213. Routine re-promulgation of ordinances circumvents the legislative branch, centralising power within the executive and turning legislatures into mere rubber stamps.
  • Shrinking Parliamentary Time: Most State Legislative Assemblies convene for barely 20 to 30 days annually. Such compressed legislative sessions lead to hasty passage of critical bills without debate and extensive reliance on the 'guillotine' to pass budgetary demands without departmental scrutiny.
  • Marginalization of the Committee System: Unlike Parliament, state assemblies rarely refer legislation to Departmentally Related Standing Committees or Select Committees. As a result, bills bypass expert analysis, public feedback via pre-legislative consultation, and formal legislative impact assessments.
  • Rigid Party Discipline (Whip System): The Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule mandates unquestioning adherence to party lines on almost every issue. The ubiquitous issuance of the whip stifles intra-party democracy and prevents legislators from exercising individual conscience or constituency interests during debates.

निष्कर्ष

Restoring legislative efficiency requires structural institutional reforms rather than merely penalising disruptions. Mandating minimum annual sitting days as recommended by the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), mandating committee scrutiny for all substantive bills, and limiting party whips strictly to confidence motions are essential steps to revive state legislative efficacy.

याद रखने योग्य तथ्य

case study
D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar (1987)

The Supreme Court struck down the continuous re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor of Bihar without placing them before the legislature, declaring routine bypass of the assembly an unconstitutional usurpation of legislative power and a fraud on the Constitution.

definition
Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy

A procedural governance framework requiring draft bills to be placed in the public domain for a minimum period (typically 30 days) along with explanatory notes and fiscal impact analyses before being introduced in the legislature.

statistic

State legislative assemblies across India meet on average for only 20 to 30 days per year, with several states completing major legislative and budgetary businesses in sessions lasting under two weeks.

PRS Legislative Research

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न

Why does the Anti-Defection Law hinder legislative debate in State Assemblies?

The Tenth Schedule penalises lawmakers who vote against their party direction with disqualification. Because parties issue whips routinely on all bills rather than just confidence votes, legislators cannot freely critique or vote against government measures based on local constituency needs.