There IS a shortage of sugar in your District where you are the District Magistrate. The Government has ordered that only a maximum amount of 30 kg sugar is to be released for wedding celebrations. A son of your close friend is getting married and your friend requests you to release at least 50 kg sugar for his son's wedding. He expresses annoyance when you tell him about the Government's restrictions on this matter. He feels that since you are the District Magistrate you can release any amount. You do not want to spoil your friendship with him. In such circumstances, how would you deal with the situation?
- ARelease the extra amount of sugar which your friend has requested for
- BRefuse your friend the extra amount and strictly follow the rules
- CShow your friend the copy of the Government instructions and then persuade him to accept the lower amount as prescribed in the rulesCorrect
- DAdvise him to directly apply to the allotting authority and inform him that you do not interfere in this matter.
Explanation
The correct answer is C. Here's why:
Option C is the most appropriate because it balances upholding official duty with trying to preserve a personal relationship.
- It upholds the rules by not releasing extra sugar.
- It addresses the friend's misunderstanding directly by showing the official government instructions, clarifying that the DM's hands are tied by policy, not personal unwillingness. This transparency helps manage the friend's expectations and annoyance.
- "Persuading him to accept" shows an effort to maintain the friendship by explaining the situation calmly and rationally, rather than just a blunt refusal.
Let's look at other options: A) Releasing extra sugar would be a clear abuse of power, unethical, illegal, and would violate government orders, especially during a shortage. This is unacceptable for a public servant. B) While refusing and strictly following rules is correct in principle, simply doing so without explanation (as implied by "strictly follow the rules") might further strain the friendship. Option C adds the crucial element of explanation and persuasion. D) Advising him to apply to another authority and stating you don't interfere is evasive and potentially misleading. As District Magistrate, you are likely the primary authority or supervisor for such matters, and deflecting responsibility isn't ideal. It also doesn't address the friend's core belief that you can help but won't.

Related questions
More UPSC Prelims practice from the same subject and topic.
- Prelims 2013CSATDecision Making
Indicate the response you find most appropriate. Choose only one response for each item. The responses will be evaluated based on the level of appropriateness for the given situation. Please attempt a…
- Prelims 2013CSATDecision Making
While travelling in a Delhi-registered commercial taxi from Delhi to an adjacent city (another State), your taxi driver informs you that as he has no permit for running the taxi in that city, he will …
- Prelims 2013CSATDecision Making
A person lives in a far off village which is almost two hours by bus. The villager's neighbour is a very powerful landlord who is trying to occupy the poor villager's land by force. You are the Distri…
- Prelims 2013CSATDecision Making
You are in-charge of implementing the Family Planning programme in an area where there is a strong opposition to the present policy. You want to convince the residents of the need for keeping small fa…
- Prelims 2013CSATDecision Making
You are a teacher in a University and are setting a question paper on a particular subject. One of your colleagues, whose son is preparing for the examination on that subject, comes to you and informs…
- Prelims 2022CSATDecision Making
How best can the problems of floods and droughts be addressed so that the losses are minimal and the system becomes resilient? In this context, one important point that needs to be noted is that India…