No Right is absolute, exclusive or inviolable. The Right of personal property, similarly, has to be perceived in the larger context of its assumed legitimacy. The Right of personal property should unite the principle of liberty with that of equality, and both with the principle of cooperation. In the light of the argument in the above passage, which one of the following statements is the most convincing explanation?

Explanation: The passage argues that no right, including personal property, is absolute. It must be viewed in a larger context and should integrate liberty, equality, and cooperation. This implies a need for balance and mutual consideration rather than an absolute individual claim. Analyzing the options: A) The Right of personal property is a Natural Right duly supported by statutes and scriptures. This contradicts the passage's opening statement that "No Right is absolute, exclusive or inviolable." The passage questions the absolute nature of rights, including property, rather than affirming it as an unqualified natural right. It also does not mention statutes or scriptures. B) Personal property is a theft and an instrument of exploitation. The Right of personal property is therefore violative of economic justice. This is an extreme interpretation not supported by the passage. The passage does not condemn personal property as theft or exploitation. Instead, it seeks to perceive and frame the right in a way that unites liberty, equality, and cooperation, implying a reform or contextualization of the right, not its abolition or condemnation. C) The Right of personal property is violative of distributive justice and negates the principle of cooperation. Similar to B, this is too strong and negative. The passage states that the right "should unite" with equality and cooperation, not that it inherently violates justice or negates cooperation. It calls for a reconciliation, not an inherent conflict. D) The comprehensive idea of economic justice demands that the Right of each person to acquisition of property has to be reconciled with that of others. This statement perfectly encapsulates the essence of the passage. - "No Right is absolute, exclusive or inviolable" implies limits and the need for reconciliation. - "perceived in the larger context of its assumed legitimacy" suggests that individual property rights must be considered within a broader societal framework. - "should unite the principle of liberty with that of equality, and both with the principle of cooperation" directly supports the idea of reconciling individual acquisition (liberty) with the rights and needs of others (equality and cooperation). This reconciliation is fundamental to a comprehensive idea of economic justice. The final answer is D.