UPSC Prelims 2016·CSAT·Logical Reasoning·Deductive Logic

The nature of the legal imperatives in any given state corresponds to the effective demands that state encounters, and that these, in their turn, depend, in a general way, upon the manner in which economic power is distributed in the society which the state controls. The statement refers to:

Dalvoy logo
Reviewed by Dalvoy
UPSC Civil Services preparation
Last updated 23 May 2026, 3:31 pm IST
  1. Athe antithesis of Politics and Economics
  2. Bthe interrelationship of Politics and EconomicsCorrect
  3. Cthe predominance of Economics over Politics
  4. Dthe predominance of Politics over Economics

Explanation

The statement describes a causal chain: the nature of legal imperatives (a political aspect) depends on effective demands, which in turn depend on how economic power is distributed in society (an economic aspect). Let's analyze the options: A) the antithesis of Politics and Economics: Antithesis means opposition or contrast. The statement clearly shows a strong connection and dependency between politics and economics, not an opposition. So, A is incorrect. B) the interrelationship of Politics and Economics: This option suggests that politics and economics are connected and influence each other. The statement explicitly demonstrates this by showing how economic power distribution influences legal imperatives. This is a broad and accurate description of the core idea presented. C) the predominance of Economics over Politics: The statement does indeed show that economic power distribution shapes legal imperatives, implying a significant influence or "predominance" of economics in this specific context. However, "interrelationship" (B) is a more fundamental and encompassing description of what the statement conveys. The statement establishes that they are related, and the specific nature of that relation involves economic influence on politics. While economic influence is highlighted, the primary point is that they are not independent but linked. "Predominance" might be considered a stronger claim than what is strictly stated by "depend, in a general way," which indicates a strong connection rather than absolute determination. D) the predominance of Politics over Economics: The statement describes the opposite direction of influence, with economics shaping politics. So, D is incorrect. The statement's main purpose is to highlight that political structures (legal imperatives) are not isolated but are deeply influenced by economic structures (distribution of economic power). This fundamental connection is best captured by the term "interrelationship." While it shows a specific direction of influence (from economics to politics), the overarching concept being illustrated is that these two domains are intertwined. The final answer is B
Logical Reasoning: The nature of the legal imperatives in any given state corresponds to the effective demands that state encounters, and t

Related questions

More UPSC Prelims practice from the same subject and topic.