Passage: The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, or the JJ Act, 2015 allows for the possibility for trying adolescents above 16 as adults if they are accused of committing a heinous offence. A heinous offence is one with a minimum punishment of seven years. Offences such as culpable homicide and causing death by negligence, which are common in drunken driving cases, are not heinous offences because they do not have a prescribed minimum punishment. The JJ Act, amended in 2021, now categorises an offence that has no minimum sentence, but has a maximum sentence of seven years or more as a serious offence which nonetheless, in the opinion of activists, does not merit the transfer of a case to the adult criminal justice system. Question: Which of the following conclusions is/are valid? 1. Only a serious offence as categorised by the revised JJ Act, justifies the transfer of a case to the adult judicial system. 2. The JJ Act, 2021, categorises an offence as a serious offence based on the maximum sentence it carries, rather than on the minimum sentence. Select the answer using the code given below.
- A1 only
- B2 onlyCorrect
- CBoth 1 and 2
- DNeither 1 nor 2
Explanation
The correct answer is Option B (2 only).
Statement 1 is incorrect: Under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, only adolescents between the ages of 16 and 18 accused of committing heinous offences can be transferred and tried as adults in the criminal justice system. Heinous offences are defined strictly as those carrying a minimum punishment of seven years of imprisonment. Furthermore, the passage explicitly notes that activists believe serious offences do not merit the transfer of a case to the adult system.
Statement 2 is correct: The Juvenile Justice Amendment Act, 2021 was enacted to address a legal anomaly previously identified by the Supreme Court in 2020. The amendment redefined serious offences to include crimes where the maximum sentence is seven years or more, but there is no prescribed minimum sentence, or the minimum sentence is less than seven years. Therefore, for these specific offences (like culpable homicide), the categorization as "serious" relies on the maximum sentence it carries rather than the minimum.
Takeaway: Remember the Juvenile Justice Act's tripartite classification of offences: Petty (up to 3 years imprisonment), Serious (3-7 years, or a maximum of 7+ years with no minimum), and Heinous (a strict minimum of 7 years). Only heinous crimes allow 16-18-year-olds to be tried as adults.

Related questions
More UPSC Prelims practice from the same subject and topic.
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
Mr. X, a senior officer, was overseeing a critical vaccination programme during a pandemic. He found that a private service provider responsible for vaccine distribution was compromising on quality to…
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances frequently led to community tensions, a flashpoint has arisen with a Government decision to allocate land for a was…
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
'X' was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term 'law' as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. 'X' explained that the meaning of the term 'law' in the Constitution …
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
Consider the following statements with reference to the Constitution of India : 1. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that specifies that the Constitution of India will be officially cal…
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
Which of the following statements with regard to the persons with disabilities in India is/are correct ? 1. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, an Act passed by the Parliament of India in 201…
- Prelims 2026GS1polity
Consider the following statements about the provisions pertaining to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in India : 1. Provisions regarding the administration of the Tribal Areas in the Stat…